prop.text
Posts
🏚️ Maymont > Divvy, Where Rates are Headed, and Arrived

🏚️ Maymont > Divvy, Where Rates are Headed, and Arrived

We explore why Maymont acquired Divvy, three scenarios for interest rates in 2025, and Arrived.

February 05, 2025

Maymont Homes Acquires Divvy Homes for $1 Billion: A Proptech Cautionary Tale

In a deal that signals both the volatility of the proptech sector and the increasing consolidation of real estate investment platforms, Maymont Homes, a subsidiary of Brookfield Properties, has announced the acquisition of rent-to-own startup Divvy Homes for approximately $1 billion. The acquisition, slated to close in mid-February 2025, represents a pivotal shift in the trajectory of a company once valued at $2.3 billion and underscores the risks facing alternative homeownership models in an era of economic uncertainty.

The Rise of Divvy Homes

Founded in 2016 by Adena Hefets, Brian Ma, Nick Clark, and Tiffany Li, Divvy Homes was built on a mission to make homeownership more accessible. Hefets, drawing from her experience as a real estate investor at TPG and a product manager at Square, saw an opportunity to provide aspiring homeowners a path to property ownership without the immediate burden of securing a mortgage. Initially envisioned as a vacation home investment platform, Divvy pivoted in 2017 to focus on primary residences, recognizing the increasing demand for alternative home financing solutions.

Divvy’s rent-to-own model allowed customers to select a home that Divvy would purchase on their behalf. The tenant would pay an upfront fee of 1-2% and allocate 10-25% of their monthly payments toward a future down payment. At the end of three years, they had the option to buy the home at a pre-set price or forfeit their accrued savings, minus a 2% relisting fee. This structure gained traction among consumers priced out of traditional mortgages, as well as among investors, leading to over $700 million in venture funding from firms like Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Tiger Global, and GGV Capital. By 2021, Divvy’s valuation had soared to $2.3 billion following a $200 million Series D round.

At its peak, Divvy owned approximately 7,000 homes across 19 U.S. markets, including Atlanta, Dallas, and Phoenix, serving over 15,000 tenants and facilitating more than 2,000 successful home purchases. The company's branding centered on empowerment, with slogans like "A home of your own isn't just a resting place" resonating with potential homeowners seeking stability and financial growth.

Maymont Homes: A Major Institutional Player

Maymont Homes, a division of Brookfield Properties, operates within the single-family rental (SFR) sector, managing a portfolio of 16,200 homes across 40 U.S. markets before the acquisition. As part of Brookfield, which controls over $850 billion in assets, Maymont has positioned itself as a leader in institutional real estate investing, specializing in property acquisition, renovation, and full-service management.

With a focus on operational efficiency, Maymont utilizes advanced technology for tenant screening, maintenance tracking, and financial analytics. Its parent company had already demonstrated strong interest in expanding its SFR footprint, launching a $300 million fund dedicated to the sector. The Divvy acquisition further solidifies Maymont’s position as a dominant force in single-family rentals, expanding its market presence and operational capabilities.

The Downfall of Divvy Homes

Despite its early success, Divvy’s model proved vulnerable to macroeconomic pressures and operational shortcomings. The most significant blow came from the Federal Reserve’s aggressive interest rate hikes between 2022 and 2024, which pushed mortgage rates from around 3% to over 7%. These increases made homeownership more expensive, reducing the number of tenants who could transition from renting to buying—a fundamental aspect of Divvy’s value proposition.

Divvy relied heavily on floating-rate debt to finance its home purchases. As borrowing costs soared, the company’s margins were squeezed, leading to financial strain. Additionally, the rent-to-own model faced increased scrutiny as tenants reported issues with high rents—often 10-30% above market rates—unfavorable lease terms, and steep surrender fees exceeding $4,400. Eviction filings, particularly in Atlanta, tripled in 2023, further damaging the company’s reputation.

Operational inefficiencies compounded these financial woes. Customers frequently reported maintenance issues, including mold, gas leaks, and delayed repairs, despite Divvy’s contractor network and 24-hour hotline. As financial pressures mounted, Divvy took drastic measures, selling off 3,200 homes—nearly 45% of its peak inventory—and implementing multiple rounds of layoffs, cutting at least 94 employees. By the time of the acquisition announcement, Divvy’s portfolio had dwindled to 3,800 properties, and the company had pivoted from growth to survival mode.

Maymont’s Strategic Acquisition

For Maymont, the Divvy acquisition presents multiple advantages. The $950 million price tag represents a 56% discount from Divvy’s peak valuation, allowing Maymont to expand its portfolio at a favorable cost. The deal increases Maymont’s holdings to over 20,000 homes, cementing its status as a leading player in the SFR market.

Beyond asset expansion, the acquisition provides Maymont with Divvy’s proprietary technology, which includes advanced tenant screening, automated rent collection, and equity tracking systems. Integrating these tools could enhance operational efficiencies across Maymont’s portfolio. Additionally, the company gains the opportunity to refine and implement a rent-to-own model, leveraging Divvy’s experience while mitigating the financial risks that led to its downfall.

Geographically, the deal strengthens Maymont’s footprint in high-growth markets such as Atlanta, Dallas, and Tampa, where 65% of Divvy’s properties are located. The strategic alignment between Divvy’s existing assets and Maymont’s focus on the South and Midwest enhances the acquisition’s long-term value.

From an operational standpoint, Maymont expects to achieve cost synergies through centralized management, potentially reducing per-property expenses by 10-15%. With Brookfield’s financial backing, Maymont is better equipped to weather interest rate fluctuations and navigate market shifts, addressing a key vulnerability that undermined Divvy’s business.

Lessons for the Proptech Sector

Divvy’s rise and fall offers several key takeaways for the broader proptech industry. First and foremost, the company’s struggles underscore the risks of relying on cheap capital for growth. In an environment of rising interest rates, business models dependent on leveraged acquisitions and rapid expansion become increasingly fragile.

Additionally, Divvy’s story highlights the importance of customer satisfaction in real estate innovation. Reports of neglected maintenance, high fees, and eviction practices damaged the company’s reputation, proving that rapid scale must be accompanied by strong execution.

For investors and employees, the acquisition serves as a cautionary tale about paper valuations. Startups that raise capital at high valuations often face difficult adjustments in downturns, with common shareholders and employees bearing the brunt of losses in distressed sales.

The future of the rent-to-own model remains uncertain. While the concept has potential, success will likely require lower leverage, stronger regulatory oversight, and partnerships with traditional lenders to mitigate risk. Increased transparency around equity accumulation and fee structures will be critical in avoiding the pitfalls that plagued Divvy.

A New Chapter for Proptech and SFR Investment

As Maymont integrates Divvy’s portfolio and technology, industry observers will be watching closely to see if the rent-to-own model can be refined into a scalable, sustainable housing solution. The success of this acquisition could influence the future of alternative homeownership models and shape the next phase of proptech evolution.

For Maymont and Brookfield, the acquisition is a strategic bet on the continued growth of the single-family rental sector. By absorbing Divvy’s assets and technology, Maymont aims to cement its leadership in a consolidating market. However, it must navigate the same challenges that contributed to Divvy’s decline, particularly interest rate sensitivity and the operational complexities of rent-to-own structures.

In the end, Divvy’s journey—from a $2.3 billion unicorn to a $1 billion acquisition—serves as both a warning and a guidepost for the future of proptech. The industry now faces a crossroads, balancing the drive for innovation with the need for financial resilience in an ever-changing real estate landscape.

We Survived to ‘25, Now What?

Since 2021, the single-family residential market has undergone a dramatic transformation. In the wake of historically low interest rates and a pandemic-fueled housing boom, the market experienced a surge in demand and skyrocketing prices. However, as the economic landscape shifted, interest rates began to climb sharply. This tightening of monetary policy, implemented to curb inflation, has since frozen the housing market. Now, in early 2025, with inflation remaining stubbornly high, investors face a complex environment where the market may continue in its current state, correct from overvaluation, or evolve by embracing a new normal. Understanding these potential paths is critical for anyone looking to navigate the uncertain waters of residential real estate investing.

How We Got Here

The rapid expansion of the housing market after 2021 was driven by a confluence of factors. During the pandemic, low borrowing costs encouraged both first-time buyers and investors to enter the market in droves, seeking larger living spaces and capitalizing on favorable mortgage conditions. The ensuing surge in demand led to rapid price escalations and a notable shift in the dynamics of residential real estate. However, as the economy began to stabilize, central banks, notably the Federal Reserve, took decisive measures to combat rising inflation by aggressively increasing interest rates. These higher rates, while necessary for curbing inflation, resulted in significantly higher borrowing costs, dampening the fervor that had once propelled the market forward.

Sticky Rates and Persistent Inflation

Even as we approach the mid-2020s, the persistence of high inflation continues to challenge economic recovery. Despite the efforts to bring it under control, inflation has proven stubborn, and the elevated interest rates have become a double-edged sword. On one side, they serve as a brake on new mortgage approvals and overall buyer activity; on the other, they erode the purchasing power of potential buyers and squeeze real returns for investors. This environment of sticky rates and persistent inflation has left the market in a state of limbo, setting the stage for three distinct scenarios: a market that remains frozen, one that undergoes a significant correction, or one that adapts to a new set of economic norms.

The Frozen Market Scenario

In one possible future, the single-family residential market may remain largely stagnant. With interest rates elevated and inflation unyielding, borrowing costs continue to deter new buyers, and transaction volumes remain low. In such a scenario, property values may remain artificially high despite the underlying economic pressures. This kind of market stasis offers a mixed bag of opportunities and challenges for investors. On the positive side, properties in a frozen market can generate steady rental incomes, providing a predictable source of cash flow. This stability can be particularly attractive to long-term investors who prioritize income over rapid capital gains.

However, the frozen market also comes with significant downsides. For investors who may need liquidity, the lack of active transactions can make it difficult to sell properties or refinance existing assets. Moreover, a stagnant market can lead to complacency, where rising costs and limited market mobility might eventually render portfolios vulnerable to shifts in consumer behavior or economic conditions. The absence of dynamic price adjustments means that the market could fail to reflect local economic realities, leaving properties overvalued relative to their true earning potential. This environment demands a high level of patience and a focus on cash flow management, as the opportunity for capital appreciation may be minimal for an extended period.

Market Correction Dynamics

A contrasting scenario envisions the market undergoing a significant correction. After years of runaway pricing fueled by exuberant demand and ultra-low borrowing costs, the single-family residential market may reach a tipping point. In this scenario, the disconnect between inflated property values and the underlying economic fundamentals becomes too great to ignore, prompting a rebalancing of prices. As interest rates remain high and inflation persists, buyers and sellers alike may be forced to confront the reality that property prices no longer reflect sustainable economic conditions. This correction, while potentially painful in the short term, could lead to a healthier and more stable market over time.

For investors, a market correction presents both risks and opportunities. Those who purchased properties at the height of the boom might find themselves facing negative equity, where the current market value of their assets falls below the outstanding mortgage balance. This scenario could put considerable strain on balance sheets and limit refinancing options. However, for investors with sufficient capital and a long-term perspective, a correction could provide an opportunity to acquire high-quality properties at a discount. In the aftermath of a correction, prices that realign with local economic fundamentals may offer a more sustainable basis for future growth. This recalibration is essential for ensuring that the market remains robust in the face of future economic challenges, as it shifts the focus from speculative price increases to value that is grounded in real economic activity.

Embracing a New Normal

The third path forward involves the market adapting to its current economic environment and evolving into a new normal. In this scenario, investors, developers, and homebuyers alike begin to accept the realities of higher borrowing costs and persistent inflation. Rather than clinging to past models of rapid price appreciation, stakeholders start to innovate in response to the new economic conditions. Developers may shift their focus toward building properties that are not only more energy-efficient but also integrated with smart technologies, catering to a market that increasingly values sustainability and technological advancement.

This new normal could also see a reconfiguration of traditional financing models. With conventional mortgage terms proving less effective in a high-interest, high-inflation environment, alternative arrangements such as shared equity schemes or flexible lease-to-own models might become more prevalent. These innovative approaches could help bridge the gap between affordability and investment returns, making it easier for a broader range of buyers to enter the market. For investors, adapting to this new normal means not only rethinking property acquisition strategies but also being proactive in seeking out assets that align with evolving consumer preferences. Properties that incorporate sustainable design elements or are located in regions with strong local economies and growth potential may command premium rents and appreciate more steadily over time.

The embrace of a new normal reflects a broader shift in the market's long-term outlook. Rather than being driven solely by speculative forces and low interest rates, the market becomes more closely tied to local economic fundamentals and innovative practices. This evolution has the potential to create a more resilient and adaptive market, better equipped to weather future economic shocks. For investors, the key lies in recognizing early signals of this transition and positioning their portfolios accordingly. Embracing innovation and sustainability, while remaining agile in response to policy changes and technological advancements, can unlock new avenues for growth even in a challenging economic landscape.

Strategic Considerations for Investors

Navigating these potential scenarios requires a nuanced approach that balances risk with opportunity. Investors must remain vigilant and adaptable, ready to adjust their strategies as market conditions evolve. In a stagnant market, the focus should be on maximizing rental income and ensuring robust cash flow management. In contrast, a market correction calls for careful risk assessment and the willingness to capitalize on opportunities that arise from discounted property values. Adapting to a new normal requires a forward-thinking mindset, one that embraces technological innovation and sustainable development as integral components of long-term success.

Investors must also consider the broader economic and policy context. With inflation continuing to challenge purchasing power and high interest rates limiting borrowing capacity, diversification becomes an essential strategy. Exposure to different asset classes and geographical regions can help mitigate the impact of localized downturns and provide a buffer against economic volatility. At the same time, keeping abreast of regulatory changes is crucial, as government policies aimed at boosting affordable housing or incentivizing green construction can have a significant impact on the market dynamics.

The single-family residential market today stands at a crossroads. The dramatic shifts since 2021, driven by low interest rates and a pandemic-induced housing frenzy, have given way to an era of high borrowing costs and persistent inflation. As we navigate early 2025, investors face three possible futures: a market that remains frozen, one that corrects itself from years of overvaluation, or one that adapts to a new normal marked by innovation and sustainability. By understanding the historical context and current economic forces at play, investors can better prepare for the uncertainties ahead.

Harrisonburg, Virginia

Single-family rental (SFR) investors should take a look at Harrisonburg, Virginia, a metro area with a population of nearly 138k (2.5% growth) according to the American Community Survey (ACS)—part of the US Census bureau.

Harrisonburg’s value to income ratio is 2% over the long-term average, and the median sale price was about $290,000 in December of 2024, down from $350,000 in April of 2023, according to Realtor.com. The median household income is $77,000. Harrisonburg is a market where investors can acquire property at a reasonable price-to-value.

Harrisonburg’s Economy

James Madison University (JMU): One of the largest employers in the area, it also provides a steady influx of students and faculty who require housing.
Sentara RMH Medical Center: A significant healthcare provider, contributing to the local economy and housing demand.
Kerry Group (formerly Ariake): A food manufacturing company, adding to the industrial sector's presence.
Tenneco Automotive Inc.: A vehicle parts manufacturer, supporting the automotive industry in the region.
Merck & Co.: The pharmaceutical giant operates a significant manufacturing facility in nearby Elkton, offering a number of well-paying jobs. The company plans a $1 billion investment to expand vaccine production.
Cargill: This major agricultural employer is a major players in the region's strong food processing sector.
Walmart Distribution Center: Plays a key role in the logistics sector, employing hundreds.

Proximity to Major Markets:

Located along Interstate 81, Harrisonburg enjoys excellent connectivity to Washington D.C. (2 hours away) and Richmond (2 hours away).
Close proximity to Shenandoah Valley offers appeal for tourism and short-term rentals.

2935 Taylor Spring Ln

This well-positioned townhouse is available for only $299,000, with an estimated monthly rent of $1,995. It’s in a prime location just across from Sentara Hospital with easy access to I-81, JMU, and downtown Harrisonburg.

The Investment Thesis

→ Affordable townhouse for only $299k
→ $1,995 / month estimated rent
→ Extra unfinished space opens the door for value-add renovations increasing living space and subsequent rents.

Property Details

Yr Built: 2001	Type: SFR
Sqft: 3,049	Bed/Bath: 3, 3

Financial Projections

Asking Price: $299,000	5 Yr Appreciation: $73,608
Revenue: $23,916	Annual Gross Income: $22,481

Interested in Learning More?

*Appreciation based on 4% growth rate.

Get-It-Done Person Builds a New England Portfolio

After working in the entertainment business in the New York area, including a stint for the rock star Jon Bon Jovi, Liz Mansfield found herself in Vermont, bartending the working promotion events for liquor companies.

She and her husband were living in a 4-unit commercial building known as the Larrow House in tiny Waitsfield’s downtown (population 1,913). When the boiler went, she sensed the owner was tired of taking care of the building and she made a low-ball offer.

“It was just a random thought and if we could get the down payment I realized that with 4 rentals we could pay the mortgage,” she said. “It was just the right timing.”

Mansfield said they bought the place for $165,000, and sold it a few years later in 2002 for $285,000 to finance the purchase of 33 acres in Granville, about 30 miles south of Waitsfield, where they built a timber frame house for about $200,000. She missed out on some tax savings when she sold, which she called “a learning experience.”

“The stupidest thing we ever did was selling that building,” she said. “We were living in a little apartment and we were happy, but we needed the money to build the house.”

Mansfield brought a logger into the Granville property and the proceeds from the sale timber covered most of the cost of the land.

Around the same time, she and her husband bought a house in Rochester, just north of Granville, and flipped it. “We just thought the flip was a fun project,” she added.

By the early 2000s, Mansfield had landed a job with the American businessman Sidney Frank, doing promotions for Grey Goose vodka and Jagermeister. Her territory included Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine. (She now works for Palm Bay International, a wine and spirits supplier.)

After a decade, she and her husband were tiring of the snowy isolation in Granville, which included a half-mile driveway that connected to a dirt road. They sold the house for $420,000 and bought a cottage in Biddeford, Maine, in a part of the town called Hills Beach.

It was another distress sale.

“It was a small lot with a burned out cottage on it and we lowballed the guy,” she said. “He was going to get fined by the town if he did not do something.”

A year or so later, they bought a two-acre lot nearby and built another house, and now use the Hills Beach house for short-term rentals. She self-manages the property, which has three bedrooms and three baths over three floors, and most of her tenants are repeat vacationers. (The two properties would sell for about $1 million each in the current market, she said.)

“I don’t like Airbnb. I like VRBO. I feel like we get a better renter,” she said. “I focus on families and I’m dog friendly and there are not a lot of places that allow dogs anymore.”

Mansfield never planned to make real estate her main side hustle, but is happy with the way things turned out.

“One thing just kind of rolled into the next one,” she said. “We were used to being landlords because we had been landlords at the Larrow House (in Waitsfield).”

She’s now looking at putting up an ADU in her backyard in Biddeford, and recently bought her mother’s house in Rochester, Vt., which she plans to rent short term when she can.

Mansfield sees these houses as more than business deals, and is particular about her buyers.

“I care about what happens after I sell because I care about these properties,” she said. “I’m not like a flipper and don’t give a shit. I want stuff that I’ve spent time and money and love on to go to the right people. I want them in the right hands. That matters to me.”

Even that parcel of forest land in Granville: “I like knowing that they’re not going to do anything to develop those 33 acres.”

What is your special real estate superpower?

No fear. I don’t have any fear and I don’t worry about jumping in. I think a lot of people are afraid to do stuff. I’m more of a risk taker. I’m really good at seeing good opportunities but a lot of people are good at that too. I’m a make-it-happen kind of person. I do what we need to do and say we’ll worry about that later.

What was the hardest lesson you learned early on in your real estate journey, and how did you overcome that and persevere?

Early on it was the Larrow House and in retrospect maybe we could have held on to that house. I wish we still owned our first investment but at that time we didn’t have the money to make that happen. Maybe I would have tried to be more resourceful to come up with the money. We did have one nightmare tenant we had to deal with so that was a learning experience. She painted the stained glass windows in the apartment and did this crazy stuff. It was hard getting rid of her, and in a small town where everybody knew each other that was not an easy thing.

What advice would you offer to somebody looking to get into real estate or grow a portfolio?

Do your homework. Make sure you know that town and make sure there aren’t restrictions on what you want to do. Look back on the deeds and make sure there aren’t any deed restrictions. Shop around for the best mortgage rates. It’s hard to not use a realtor when you are buying something, but when you are selling something you don’t need to use a realtor. I’ve sold all of our houses on my own, through Zillow or whatever. All you need is a lawyer, but some people don’t feel safe and need that reassurance of having an agent.

Among the strategies a property owner could pursue — long-term rental, mid-term rental or short term, (Airbnb), co-living — what works best for you, and why?

Definitely short-term rental. I really don’t like anybody being at our properties for more than two weeks and I really don’t like to rent to groups and we don’t want people to have parties. We’re very strict about our rental policies. I like to have control over who is in my house. With a long-term rental, the people are in your house for a long period of time. I need access to my place — I want to get inside and I’m particular about how I want people to treat my property. Plus, it’s more lucrative. The Airbnb fees are stupid so that’s why I don’t go through them.

What do you think is the biggest issue investors face in 2025 and beyond?

Right now it’s hard to find those deals. Everything is inflated and the market is completely fucked up because of Covid. The prices have just become unrealistic. Everything is selling for way more than assessed value. It’s so messed up. In Maine and Vermont prices have just gone crazy. Assessed values are one-third of what houses are selling for. The banks won’t even loan you the money. Unless you have cash, you’re SOL.

Arrived: Democratizing Real Estate Investment Through Fractional Ownership

In the evolving landscape of real estate investment, Arrived has emerged as a pioneering platform, enabling individuals to invest in rental properties with minimal capital and without the complexities traditionally associated with property management. By offering fractional ownership, Arrived opens the doors to real estate investment to a broader audience, allowing participation with investments starting as low as $100.

Founding and Mission

Established in 2019 by Ryan Frazier, Kenny Cason, and Alejandro Chouza, Arrived was born from the vision of making real estate investment accessible to everyone. The founders recognized the significant barriers—such as substantial capital requirements and the demands of property management—that deterred many potential investors. Their mission was to simplify the investment process and lower these barriers, enabling individuals to build wealth through real estate.

Business Model and Operations

Arrived's platform streamlines the real estate investment process into a few straightforward steps:

Property Acquisition: The company employs a rigorous selection process to identify and purchase rental properties with strong investment potential. Notably, less than 0.2% of the homes they review pass their stringent diligence process, ensuring that only top-tier properties are offered to investors.
Fractional Ownership: Each property is divided into shares, allowing investors to purchase stakes in specific properties. Investors can start with as little as $100, making it feasible for individuals across various financial backgrounds to participate.
Passive Income and Appreciation: Investors earn returns through monthly dividends generated from rental income and benefit from potential property appreciation over time. This dual-income approach enhances the investment's attractiveness.
Professional Management: Arrived handles all aspects of property management, including tenant screening, rent collection, maintenance, and accounting. This comprehensive management ensures that investors can enjoy passive income without the typical hassles of being a landlord.

Growth and Performance

Since its inception, Arrived has demonstrated significant growth:

Investor Engagement: The platform has attracted over 723,000 registered investors, reflecting widespread interest and trust in its model.
Capital Raised: Arrived has facilitated investments totaling more than $226 million, indicating robust investor participation and confidence.
Property Portfolio: The company has funded over 437 properties across 61 active markets in the United States, providing investors with diverse opportunities to build their portfolios.

Investment Options

Arrived offers various investment products to cater to different investor preferences:

Single-Family Residential Properties: Investors can choose specific single-family homes to invest in, allowing for tailored portfolio building.
Single-Family Residential Fund: This fund provides instant diversification by pooling multiple properties across various markets. It offers benefits such as always-available investing, higher maximum investment thresholds, and lower operational costs due to economies of scale. Investors can request redemptions six months after their initial investment, subject to certain conditions.
Private Credit Fund: For those interested in real estate debt investments, this fund offers potential high yields secured by residential properties. It provides a different risk-return profile compared to equity investments in rental properties.

Fee Structure

Transparency in fees is a cornerstone of Arrived's approach:

Annual Asset Management Fee: 0.15% of the property's purchase price.
Property Management Fee: 8% of gross rents for long-term rentals; for short-term rentals, the fee ranges from 15% to 25% of gross rents, plus an additional 5% fee.

These fees cover the costs of professional management and platform services, ensuring that properties are well-maintained and operations run smoothly.

Investor Accessibility

Arrived is committed to inclusivity in real estate investment:

Low Minimum Investment: With a minimum investment of $100, the platform lowers the financial barrier to entry, allowing more individuals to participate.
No Accreditation Requirement: Both accredited and non-accredited investors are welcome, broadening the potential investor base.
Flexible Investment Amounts: Investors can allocate anywhere from $100 to approximately $20,000 per house, providing flexibility to suit various investment strategies and financial capacities.

Risk Considerations

While Arrived offers an accessible entry point into real estate investing, potential investors should be mindful of certain risks:

Illiquidity: Real estate investments are generally long-term commitments, and while the Single-Family Residential Fund offers some liquidity options, these are subject to conditions and are not guaranteed.
Market Fluctuations: Property values and rental incomes can be affected by economic conditions, local market dynamics, and other factors beyond the company's control.
Fee Impact: The various fees associated with the investment can affect overall returns and should be carefully considered when evaluating potential profitability.

As with any investment, it's crucial to conduct thorough due diligence, understand the associated risks, and consider how the investment aligns with personal financial goals. To learn more or invest today, head over to Arrived and make your first or next investment today.